Thursday 17 September 2020

A minor study on the Mid-Day Meal Scheme



A report on Household Social Consumption on Education in India for the year 2017-18 was released by the National Statistical Office. It dispersed various facts on education, internet facility, and literacy rate in both the rural and urban sectors through a survey. A table on the mid-day meal scheme was exposed.

It effected that 52.6% of students in the rural area between the age of 3 to 35 attend pre-primary and above level of education as they were provided mid-day meal/tiffin/nutrition. Whereas in urban, 30.2% attend for the same factor. Rewinding the history of the scheme, Tamil Nadu has notably been its pioneer.

Kamarajar was the man behind the introduction of the Mid-day meal scheme. The main objective of the scheme is ‘to enhance enrollment, retention, and attendance’ among school children and thereby improving their nutritional standards.

Talking about the positive aspects, it has contributed to an increase in education enrollment, especially in the rural sector. It is also a major relief to low-income group families. On the other hand, the scheme has also generated employment to support the preparation of food, transportation, supervision, and others.

With respect to the funds for meeting expenditure, the two main sources are the gross budgetary support and a cess. A study has claimed that the majority of expenses were met through the cess collected. However, there has been a gradual decline in the budget allocation for this scheme over years. Only in the recent past, there was a 5% raise.

On the contrary, the quality of food was subject to controversy. Perhaps, the outbreak of coronavirus has largely effected this scheme too. Although the government claimed to make arrangements for the distribution of food to those children, some rural households were also informed that they will be issued money under this scheme. While some officials claimed to issue the grains through PDS or ration cards. Not all rural households own a ration card. This again is a drawback in managing the issue which thereby leaves the main objective unaddressed. Lockdown, closure of schools, digitalization, and online education has further increased the gap between the rural population and basic needs.